Assess the Marxist View That the Main Role of the Family Is to Serve the Interests of Capitalism

Assess the Marxist count on that the master(prenominal) role of the family is to divine service the interests of capitalist economy. There are many different perspectives of the family. Each different view sees different things as the main role of the family. Marxists view the family in a very belittled manner. They believe that the main role of the family is to serve the interests of capitalism and bourgeoisie. They in any case believe that the family cushions the main provider. Marxs views on the capitalist regularity of production highlights the exploitative nature of the eco system.He displays how the middle class take reinforcement of the working class and their labour the working class are a tool used to create profit and to keep profit at a reasonable level. Marx lay outs that the monogamous middle class nuclear family genuine to help them solve the problem of the inheritance of private property. The men necessitate to know who their children were in order to pass on their property to their heirs. The family was hence thought to be by Marxists as designed to control women and nourish property.The Middle class nuclear family is emerged with capitalism. It is patriarchal as designed to see and encourage male power through the inheritance of property. It therefore serves the interests of capitalism. Marxists would argue that families are a unit of nurture, they believe that the family is essential in the reproduction of the labour force. In pre capitalist society people only grew secure foods, drank water and lived simple lifes. People choose to have legion(predicate) children. More children meant more farm hands and help around the farm.It also acted as an insurance, against the famine, disease and other natural disasters. After the industrial transmutation this all changed, Families would have slight children because there was a higher mishap of them surviving. Men would find themselves working and getting paid much less than the money they made for the business Engel says womens role in the family was grating as they did unpaid work such as cleaning and childcare. The capitalist benefits from the unpaid labour given to them by women and children within the unit.Zaretsky argues that the family is a major(ip) consumer of capitalist products. This fact in itself ensures a market for capitalist products. Because it federal agency that the working class are first exploited and underpaid and then overcharged to procure the goods they do non need which they produced. Functionalists would argue industrialisation led to the slow down replacement of extended families by nuclear families because industrialisation requires more geographic and social mobility.Geographical mobility is easier for nuclear families while if within extended families young adults strive higher social status through social mobility than their parents this, according to Parsons would throw away for social tensions within the extended family wh ich would be avoided if young married adults lived on an individual basis in their own nuclear family. Industrialisation leads also to processes of structural eminence which implies that new more specialised social institutions such as factories, schools and hospitals conk out to take over some of the functions previously performed by families.This means therefore that the nuclear family loses some of its functions but it remains crucial in relation to the two functions which it does retain, the socialisation of the young and the stabilisation of adult personalities. In conclusion, the main purpose of the family is to support capitalism to a certain extent as Marxists have many valid points however Capitalism may not be seen as biased and therefore the Marxist view of the family is jilted and Marxists ignore family diversity completely.